![]() Your observation that there is no REAL technical obstacle to this is correct, but the features that the dominant tech companies choose to build or not build pretty much determines the outcome. You might say "well what about Windows or MacOS or Linux", and that's valid, but no sane audio company is going to build a streaming device or service that doesn't support iOS and Android in 2023. ![]() You also get offline capabilities and access to TIDAL Connect and can stream music quality up to 1411kbps. The fact that the dominant smartphones don't let you capture the audio stream basically leads to this crappy patchwork of protocols and proprietary solutions. It works much like Spotify Free, limiting the number of track skips users can make on mobile. So if you want to stream Spotify, Qobuz, or whatever to another device, you actually have to get Spotify or Qobuz to collaborate with you to build that feature into your streamer. The ability to control playback with Alexa and Siri voice assistants adds convenience, and the multiroom streaming feature allows you to enjoy music throughout your home. You also can't just build Chromecast or Airplay into your device, you need permission from Google or Apple, which is not necessarily easy or cheap to get. It provides high-quality audio streaming with support for popular music services like Spotify, TIDAL, and Amazon Music. This means that even if DLNA was still being developed, and they wanted to cover this use case, they couldn't do it without building support for every music streaming app individually. ![]() Having looked into this problem at my previous job, it boils down to one major stumbling block: IIRC neither iOS nor Android expose the raw audio stream from one app to another app at the OS level. Tidal was the first music streaming service to offer a couple of significant points of difference to Spotify: (supposedly) superior audio quality and (supposedly) higher payments to recording. Or, you need to use one device to remotely control another device (ala Spotify Connect) which DLNA also doesn't do.Ģ) The DLNA group dissolved 6 years ago, nobody is going to build anything on a spec that's stopped development that long.Ī better question is why WiSA and Play-Fi never took off, either. You need to share a live audio stream as well as synchronize it across multiple devices, which AFAIK DLNA doesn't do. Almost every song deserves a like connected like this Sonos Connect + SMSL m500 MQA DAC via USB + Onkyo Receiver Better than Chord Mojo but the m500 has real issues playing back from the Sonos Connect through optical. 2 major and IMO good reasons DLNA is not used for sharing streamed audio around a home network.ġ) DLNA is designed for locally stored media, Qobuz, Spotify, etc are not that. Move your favorite playlists, tracks, albums, and artists from other streaming services and listen to them on TIDAL today. Theres no stereo integration on the level of Spotify Connect, but you can play TIDAL wirelessly on a receiver with Apple Airplay. It came down to Qobuz, Tidal, Spotify & Amazon Music.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |